5011| 21
|
Sony 秘密武器 |
| ||
相關帖子 |
||
發表於 2015-12-10 07:06:27
|
顯示全部樓層
| ||
發表於 2015-12-10 16:56:13
|
顯示全部樓層
| ||
Live in the Moment
|
||
發表於 2015-12-12 22:15:22
|
顯示全部樓層
點評
the curvature would be easy to measure in a lab
In a way, it's isolating themselves from other systems (lenses).
Very good point !!!
| ||
發表於 2015-12-13 00:04:14
|
顯示全部樓層
點評
I see, thanks, Vince.
To alter the plane of focus of a lens designed for a flat sensor to suit a curved sensor, at least one element has to be added. So, a slight deterioration of image quality is inevitable.
Alec: the point is to ensure the (sagittal and tangential) rays hit the sensor as close to right angle as possible. This would minimize color aberrations and smearing towards the edges of the image.
Yes, what's the point?
Generally not as the light travel distance has changed
| ||
發表於 2015-12-13 20:47:54
|
顯示全部樓層
| ||
發表於 2015-12-14 01:46:32
|
顯示全部樓層
| ||
發表於 2015-12-14 11:44:45
|
顯示全部樓層
點評
I don't think software is able to refocus scattered light satisfactorily. Even if the intended plane of focus is known, there is no way to make up for the missing information.
May be you won't agree, to see the effects of lens, sensor, software separately is not realistic. Even the same lens is different on M8, M9, M240....
Just another Mini Disc marketing for me, the quality is still in lens design, corner improvement is always depend on lens, not sensor or photoshop
| ||
發表於 2015-12-14 14:18:31
|
顯示全部樓層
| ||
Live in the Moment
|
||
小黑屋|手機版|Archiver|mclassic.com.hk
GMT+8, 2024-11-26 12:05 , Processed in 0.034943 second(s), 28 queries .
Powered by Discuz! X3.4
© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.