~徵求意見~ Voigtlander 75/1.8 or Leitz Tele-Elmarit ...

0.95

小弟自從玩咗RF以嚟，從來未用過50mm以上嘅鏡，總覺得frameline太細，好似好難用咁。。。

但近年玩得28/35/50嘅鏡多，有啲悶悶哋，想試吓啲新鮮嘢，打算搵返支中距離至中長距離嘅75/90嘅鏡，主打掃街時多返少少人文嘅close-up或者平時影吓老婆同個女。

講用途，75係咪會易用啲呢？90感覺好似好難用咁。。

講quality，肥九comments一般都幾好，VC75.8就好壞參半啦，不過VC75光圈又大咗成一級多少少，對於影film同中長焦距嚟講，快門可以快得一級得一級固然都幾重要。。。

我平時多數搭支Cron 40

Budget HKD4000-5000左右啦。LUX75 or Cron90嗰啲唔使推介啦，太貴太大支啦。
如果呢兩支，大家會點揀？

thanks for advice.

花輪

75同50差別不太大吧...
ELMARIT M 90(E46) 現在性價比好好！
入得過

kgv

咁不如 Nikkor-PC 85/2
有師兄賣緊

vincecharus

Summarit 75/2.5? 我以前有支，幾好（但不及75/2AA），遲的摷翻的舊相post下啦。

photoinsc

90 2.8 易揾易放

0.95

其實我都偏向試吓90先~

咁如果肥九同built in hood version 嘅Elmarit 90比又如何呢？
聞說，built in hood嗰支表現比肥九有過之而無不及

vincecharus

vincecharus 發表於 2013-10-5 23:29
Summarit 75/2.5? 我以前有支，幾好（但不及75/2AA），遲的摷翻的舊相post下啦。

M9 + Summarit 75/2.5 sample pic

vincecharus

vincecharus 發表於 2013-10-10 14:08
M9 + Summarit 75/2.5 sample pic

M9 + Summarit 75/2.5 sample pic 2

bubu

A "fat 9" for your reference.

vincecharus

bubu 發表於 2013-10-11 01:10
A "fat 9" for your reference.

Fat 9 excellent!!!

有心有力之作，好！

bubu

vincecharus 發表於 2013-10-11 01:40
Fat 9 excellent!!!

有心有力之作，好！

Thanks.

It is indeed a great but inexpensive lens for portrait.

vincecharus

bubu 發表於 2013-10-11 01:44
Thanks.

It is indeed a great but inexpensive lens for portrait.

It's a great portrait!
Personally, I tend to work with 75 much more than 90. I don't know whether this is ever going to change.

bubu

vincecharus 發表於 2013-10-11 01:47
It's a great portrait!
Personally, I tend to work with 75 much more than 90. I don't know whether  ...

You know, a step further to or away from your object almost makes these two focal lengths the same.

Since the Fat 9 is truly a telescopic lens that its barrel is shorter than 90mm length, it could easily be handier than most 75mm lenses.

ww129

0.95 Hing,

Allow me to post one taken by Elmarit-M 90 for your reference: