Huawei P9, a gimmick or not?

redrede

I believe the P9 is not a bad smartphone at all. My previous Nokia phone is better than my current Sony on taking AF picture. They are 3 years technology apart and my Sony should have done better in performance if this is only defined by brand. On the other hand, my wife had the copy of Samsung Chinese phone which was only cost 2k from tst shop. It was working fine and when the phone died within a year, the shop has allowed her to exchange another one for free!
So I think we are all based on what the expectation from a phone than what the phone can actually "can do" for you.

bubu

redrede 發表於 2016-4-24 18:03
I believe the P9 is not a bad smartphone at all. My previous Nokia phone is better than my current S ...

I also hope P9 performs as good as its price suggests.

I guess the Plus version will be selling close to 6 grams Hong Kong.

Not cheap. Quality pictures alone doesn't make a phone good enough against competition.

Chinese-Tee

用手機拍出奶味，
http://photoblog.hk/wordpress/154702

來自: iPhone客戶端

bubu

Chinese-Tee 發表於 2016-5-17 18:43
用手機拍出奶味，
http://photoblog.hk/wordpress/154702

Thanks for sharing, mate.
Yes, most of the B&W pictures are indeed very good.

My anger for their marketing dishonesty still lingers, though.

Chinese-Tee

Huawei 被踢爆！暗示 P9 拍照樣本, 被揭出自 $4500 美元裝置


http://www.price.com.hk/news.php?sec_id=12&id=6013

bubu

Chinese-Tee 發表於 2016-7-5 14:57
Huawei 被踢爆！暗示 P9 拍照樣本, 被揭出自 $4500 美元裝置

Haha, shame!

The maunufacturer then had to apologize to the public for misleading and deleted this shot from their site.

One can see how unprofessional Huawei's brand team/communication partner is to handle the P9 campaign. Any person with the slightest digital photography knowledge would know a picture contains EXIF.

kgv

bubu 發表於 2016-7-5 16:01
Haha, shame!

The maunufacturer then had to apologize to the public for misleading and deleted th ...

Yiuuuuuu !
Not just "What a shame!"
直頭喺 "What the Fxxk!"

四千幾蚊
的手機
影唔到 專業級數照片
無人會怪你

而家
又比人踢爆 造假
真羞家 !!!

好好一個 brand name
咁就死咗一大半, if not 死晒 ...

下次再有新嘢
搵鬼信都得喇

kgv

其實 ...
單單喺
影完之後
1. 可以 改光圈效果
2. 可以 隨時隨意 任選對焦點
對於手機來講
已經 喺一大賣點 !
只要你唔手震
快快影完
之後 慢慢搞
一幅相 可以變出幾幅 發給唔同焦點的朋友
真喺 已經好實用喇 (I actually love using it a lot)


何須 作大 兼 老作

cw90

大陸野就係咁
乜都要充大頭

bubu

全世界都会呃, 分别在技巧。

我估, 华为的Marcom没有嚴格要求它的广告代理或网络打手, 千万不可用非P9拍的图。
这在中国广告主来說是常见的，因版权意识薄弱, 傳播自律性往往處於低水平。
甚至這图有可能是由Marcom(甲方)交出來指定要用。

碰啱上图的公司儍下儍下, 唔知有的social media顕示EXIF...咪出醜囉

Jason

.

M3fans

For years Canon/Nikon did all these stuff. Leica even more, digital Leica made in Portugal dissembled and resembled in Germany to make it legitimate for "made in Germenay", haha for many years la. All actually made in Partugal....
得舒服, 咪此佢囉  

bubu

M3fans 發表於 2016-7-6 19:49
For years Canon/Nikon did all these stuff. Leica even more, digital Leica made in Portugal dissemble ...

Leica㸃都唔会用别廠機拍話係自已機啩!

M3fans

bubu 發表於 2016-7-6 20:30
Leica㸃都唔会用别廠機拍話係自已機啩!

well, based on what I know, all brands did these in the film days. They hired advertising agencies to do the PR materials but none of the ad photo professionals use 135 film those days. You might know as well, but I knew, that was some 30 yrs ago.

bubu

M3fans 發表於 2016-7-6 21:33
well, based on what I know, all brands did these in the film days. They hired advertising agencies ...

Well, it reminds me the days we handled the Kodak account. They did ask us to shoot with Kodak film, both stills and commercials.

The Fujifilm did not ask for this.

While we handled Canon, they gave us pictures to run their ads, or simply did adaptation on artworks from Japan.

cw90

canon nikon 呢d大牌子一早上晒岸，造唔造假都大把人買
leica想打入手機市場，搵著個大陸brand合作但又造假
聲譽自然受損