5672| 28
|
Raw mode on the Leica M8- Uncompressed DNG uncovered |
| ||
相關帖子
|
||
發表於 2014-2-20 10:27:44
|
顯示全部樓層
| ||
發表於 2014-2-20 13:32:56
|
顯示全部樓層
點評
I can see the raw files, but need to download the tools from the M8raw2dng tools to open them in lightroom
| ||
發表於 2014-2-20 15:37:30
|
顯示全部樓層
| ||
| ||
發表於 2014-2-20 17:05:51
|
顯示全部樓層
| ||
發表於 2014-2-20 17:08:56
|
顯示全部樓層
| ||
發表於 2014-2-20 17:15:49
|
顯示全部樓層
點評
same exposure, both @ iso1250, 1/15sec f/4 summaron 35 2.8
tattat ching, different exposure?
sorry, the first one I focused on the fan, the second one I focused on the ram slot, the noise are much less from the raw file compare to the dng.
| ||
發表於 2014-2-21 01:42:31
|
顯示全部樓層
點評
you extract the exe to same folder as the raw file, and double click the exe. it will convert the files automaticlly.
| ||
發表於 2014-2-21 13:50:42
|
顯示全部樓層
| ||
Live in the Moment
|
||
發表於 2014-2-24 05:25:47
|
顯示全部樓層
點評
I also observed RAW>DNG is way better than JPG in terms of noise level, but how about RAW->DNG vs DNG? I think they look quite similar in my tests.
| ||
發表於 2014-2-24 10:33:48
|
顯示全部樓層
| ||
發表於 2014-2-24 19:18:24
|
顯示全部樓層
| ||
發表於 2014-2-27 01:00:34
|
顯示全部樓層
| ||
發表於 2014-3-1 00:28:29
|
顯示全部樓層
點評
My observation: RAW -> DNG provided better DR and lower noise than regular DNG from M8. I tried not to use >ISO640 before. With this RAW->DNG option, I will use high ISO more in low light situation.
| ||
發表於 2014-3-1 01:24:08
|
顯示全部樓層
點評
It is because the RAW+jpg consume around 26MB of data (20 RAW+6 jpg). May be that's why Leica did not put this in the option menu to draw down the processing speed. Leica should add to next FW update.
| ||
發表於 2014-3-1 15:20:09
|
顯示全部樓層
| ||
小黑屋|手機版|Archiver|mclassic.com.hk
GMT+8, 2024-11-28 02:38 , Processed in 0.050422 second(s), 24 queries .
Powered by Discuz! X3.4
© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.